25 Following


Currently reading

The Story of English in 100 Words
David Crystal
State of the World 2013: Is Sustainability Still Possible?
The Worldwatch Institute
Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge
Edward O. Wilson
Selected Poems
John Keats, John Barnard
Complete Works
Plato, C.J. Rowe, Stanley Lombardo, Paul Woodruff, J.M. Edmonds, John M. Cooper, Paul Ryan, Dorothea Frede, Alexander Nehamas, Anthony Kenny, Rosamond Kent Sprague, Nicholas D. Smith, Karen Bell, D.S. Hutchinson, Donald J. Zeyl, Francisco J. Gonzalez, Diskin Clay, Malcolm
Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism
Paul Boghossian
An Historical and Critical Dictionary Translated Into English with Many Additions and Corrections Made by the Author Himself
Pierre Bayle
Great Paintings
Karen Hosack, Angela Wilkes
Shelley's Nature Poems
Percy Bysshe Shelley
Philosophy of Biology: An Anthology
Alex Rosenberg (Editor), Robert Arp (Editor)

The Sense of Beauty

The Sense of Beauty - George Santayana I think if Santayana had practiced theology instead of philosophy it would be better for him , theologians would give him a high wage , he is a metaphysician in the first place.

Santayana isn't taking an aesthetic situation at all , he is taking art from a psychological point of view not aesthetics, he made a Special Relativity theory in art as Einstein did in physics , there's no absolute beauty just relative ( to a moral observer in our situation ) if so then what we are doing here ?! why you wrote the book ?!

A theory of aesthetics based on morality , speaks of art in terms of Good and Evil ??!! This theory has nothing to do with art exactly as Santayana has nothing to do with philosophy.Then if beauty is pleasure as Santana thinks , I can say that a cup of wine is the highest form of art , nothing can give (to speak out of sexual relationships ) pleasure more than it .On the other hand a cup of wine is bad thing (healthy speaking) , Evil in Santayana's words and cannot be beautiful according to his moral theory because the beautiful is good and vise versa .

I don't know on what kind of logic this theory is based , Aristotelian maybe ?!!